Sampling & recruitment: who, how many and why
Whom you study determines what you can conclude. The sample isn't a technical detail — it's the very foundation of validity.
Choose a sampling strategy deliberately
Quantitative studies often aim for representativeness (random or stratified sampling); qualitative studies aim for richness and relevance (purposive or theoretical sampling). Justify the choice from the question: who must be included for the answer to be meaningful, and whom do you risk leaving out?
Justify the size
In quantitative research a power calculation makes the sample size defensible: how many are needed to detect an effect of a given size? In qualitative research the point is saturation — when new data stop yielding new insight. Be explicit about how you determined the number.
Recruitment is where ethics and feasibility meet. Plan consent, access and privacy (Sikt/GDPR) before you approach a single participant.
Know your bias
Every sample has bias: selection, self-selection, attrition. Naming these sources and assessing how they affect your conclusions is a mark of methodological maturity — and it pre-empts the most common objection from reviewers.
Common pitfalls
- Choosing a sample from convenience without justifying it.
- Stating a sample size with no power calculation or saturation.
- Overlooking selection and attrition bias.
Ready to move on when…
- The sampling strategy is justified from the question.
- The size is defended (power or saturation).
- Sources of bias are named and assessed.
Take your research from reading to doing
ResearchPartner gives you the full in-app guide, the literature matrix, analysis tools and publishing support — free.
Join ResearchPartner — free